Tag Archives: next steps for tea party

A Real Grassroots Alternative & Objective for Tea Party: Summary

Updated:

I am in the process of rewriting this summary. I was mistaken in my idea that there was a consensus on the next round, or at least I underestimated how much the “national coalition” would fall apart.

A consensus seems to have developed regarding when the next Tea Party event should be held: July 4.  In addition to this post, which summarizes the reasons for a grassroots alternative to the present structure, I have proposed an objective going forward. This is a summary of both. The full text of the objective can be found here.

Proposal:

Consider a real grassroots alternative for the Tea Party “movement”

 

We the people of the grassroots need to provide an alternative to the top-down entities who appointed themselves sponsors and whose agendas and motives are at best, unclear.

For any who may be angered about why I should say such a blasphemous thing, know that it is no easy thing to risk voicing criticism at this stage, not only considering the number of Americans waking up to the problems  we are facing,  but also to risk the potential backlash from my fellow Tea Partiers, and providing fodder for the vicious Left, who don’ t need anymore ammunition.

The consequences of mismanagement, fragmentation, and lack of effectiveness at this point are dire enough that it is time to speak out.

If we want to re-tether ourselves to Constitutional principles as a nation, then that means we want the power to come from the bottom up, not the top down.

If we cannot abide by or implement those principles in the way we conduct ourselves in an effort to rally our fellow countrymen against an ever more powerful government, do we have any real business leading the charge?

The first round of Tea Party event was Feb. 27th, the impetus for which was Rick Santelli’s “rant” on the CNBC morning show “SquawkBox” on Feb. 19 wherein he said he was going to have a Tea Party on July 4 on Lake Michigan in protest of the mortgage rescue plan and all of the bailouts.

Essentially two little “seeds” germinated the day of Santelli’s rant; American Spectator’s J.P. Freire decided to have a Tea Party at NOON EST in Washington, D.C. on Friday, Feb. 27th while CPAC was in session and a couple of very feisty Twitter users began to Tweet like crazy trying to rally everyone who would listen to do something about putting on Tea Parties.

What happened next is partly unclear, but by mid-afternoon on Friday, TCOT’s Michael P. Leahy scheduled a conference call for anyone who was interested in a “CNBC Reporter Tea Party Event”.  There were approximately a dozen people on the call. Everyone present either agreed to put on a Tea Party or help with effort nationally.

Those efforts grew over the course of six days into 40+ cities with 15,000 – 20,000 participants. A handful of volunteers on the national level and one to three people in each of those cities pulled off a near miracle. They worked extremely hard, showing leadership. Included in that effort was the setup of a NING site for each of the fifty states, to provide a launching pad for organizing the Tea Party events and to lay a foundation for a network in each state.

Although the Feb. 27 events didn’t receive widespread “main stream media” coverage nationally, the phenomenon ultimately went viral.

But even before that began happening, the hi-jacking effort was in full swing. Don’t Go’s Eric Odom, who was not a major player in the events leading up to Feb. 27, put up the taxdayteaparty.com website live by 2:30PM CST on Feb. 28. TCOT’s Leahy by all indications was not aware of this until after it occurred.

By Monday, March 2, Odom and Leahy had somehow come to “terms” and had decided to roll-in another, even newer online entity, Smart Girl Politics. On that evening’s conference call which was supposed to be primarily evaluative in nature and a discussion of next steps, was in reality a top-down call that consisted of announcements of the next steps, themes, “sponsors”, and instruction to forward all contact information collected by local event organizers into TCOT to be shared among the three groups.

Leahy defined success for the next national event day of April 15 this way:

“more people, more email addresses”

He noted the theme:

“Repeal the Pork, Cut Taxes”

How would the collection of email addresses Repeal the Pork or cut taxes?

Obviously, it won’t. What it could do, however, is provide a ready-made database for any variety of purposes including building new organizations, sending fund raising appeals, or for a major political campaign.

The March 2 had contentious moments. Leahy became what can only be described as irritated when questioned by late comers to the call about the selection of another weekday for another Tea Party event.

Besides the irritation, Leahy reminded callers on the line several times that the conference was being broadcast live on two Blog Talk Radio shows. (You can listen to the Grizzly Groundswell verion here.)

He also deflected particular questions, noting that discussions on those issues would occur “offline”. Most of those offline calls never took place.

A number of others did, however. For the next several days I and several other people across the country received calls from organizers who were not happy about the top-down nature of the call, and questioned the motive behind the instruction to  forward email lists. Most expressed a desire to “do something” about the situation. None wanted to lose the momentum coming out of their events.

Ultimately, some decided not to participate in any future conference calls with more dropping out when fund raising efforts began. To the best of my knowledge, it never went to any of the Tea party coordinators.

In other words, many organizing Tea Party events simply went their own way and a golden opportunity to form a truly grassroots effort with a cohesive message and effective objective was lost.

Unfortunately, the “walk-away message” from Tax Day Tea Party, from most media outlets, even including Fox News Channel, was that the events were tax revolts. The overwhelming majority further painted the events as Republican party, Newt Gingrich, Freedom Works orchestrated tax protests.

And unfortunately, both the truth of the situation and decisions by local organizers about speakers played directly into these characterizations. It is a fact that there has been very curious involvement by Freedom Works from the national level.  I was personally contacted by a man in their Washington, D.C. office, a fellow Nebraskan by Dick Armey himself. People with connections to Newt Gingrich also contacted organizers. And former Speaker Gingrich himself was at one point names “official spokesmen” for the Tea Party movement.

The best thing to come out of the whole movement would be the establishment of truly grassroots local networks.  That assumes, in the absence of effective leadership from the national “coalition” or consistent communications with other organizers a recognition of that fact and a plan for best doing so by each coordinator in each locality.  Considering that they had no guidance on this issue at all, and no good example of what should be avoided, it is difficult, at best to believe that these efforts to be effective over the long term are widespread.

The simple facts are these:

  • In general, our country has come untethered from its Constitutional basis.
  • Government is out of control, at all levels.
  • Unsustainable, reckless spending, borrowing, and printing of money seriously threatens to collapse the value of our currency.
  • A plethora of proposed legislation threatens individual liberty.
  • A serious world-wide drive towards a one-world currency permanently threatens the sovereignty of the United States.
  • The majority of the media doesn’t investigate or report fully on events or people. As a result we are under-informed about who represents us, who is running for office, and the actions taken by government.

Beyond PR concerns, and the specific issues surrounding the Republican Party, it begs the question, once again, if we have even a small amount of understanding in regards to how serious are problems are, why are we not re-examining the way we do EVERYTHING?

july-4-signatures1-181x300

A Proposed Objective for Tea Party: Summary

Updated May 14, 2009:

When I first wrote this point, I was still exploring the idea of Constitutional amendments. I have learned since, that contrary to what I was hoping, the only avenues available to amend the Constitution prevent implementing the idea of amendments in the current environment.

There has never been amendment by Constitutional Convention. This, as is turns out, is a very dangerous process. The Convention cannot be convened for a defined or specific purpose. In other words, the entire Constitution would be opened to amendment.

At some point in the very near future, I will lay out here the specifics of the process and what they would mean for a real movement towards amending the Constitution.

The important issues which I have noted and Friedman’s suggested cure have not changed. The question is; how can the necessary changes be implemented? That is what I am currently pondering.

Originally posted April 21, 2009

This post is a summary of the full explanation. Click here to read the full text.

A general consensus seems to have developed concerning the next date for Tea Party events: July 4.

july-4-signatures1

I am not alone in my thinking that the greatest show of force to date may be obtained by encouraging as many people as possible to rally at their State Capitols on July 4.

Understandably, many localities still wish to convene their own event.  In order to carry out the notion of gather as many people at the State Capitols as possible, perhaps the best possible concept would be to encourage those locations outside of the State Capitols to conduct their Tea Party either before or after the statewide event.  Fireworks, anyone?

Proposal:

“Independence Day Tea Party”

Re-Declaring Our Independence
Imagine the visual impact of nationwide reenactments of the reading of the original Declaration of Independence, followed by a proclamation, a “New Declaration of Independence”.

The way to re-declare independence may be to roll-out a set of Constitutional amendments, which encapsulates a number of those already circulating in addition to ideas expounded upon by the economist Milton Friedman, perhaps entitled, a “Second Bill of Rights”.

In the book, Free to Choose, Friedman walked through the logic of the necessity of a number of amendments in a way that is difficult to refute.

Here is a summary of a suggested list of amendments that is meant to serve as a launching pad for discussion. The discussion that should be taking place in every household, every county, and in every state across this country is, how are we to correct our many problems; which among the available options provides the best path for lasting reversal of the trend that has developed?

A Second Bill of Rights?

1. Abolish the Federal Reserve, prevent the future creation of a central banking system, prevent the Federal government from adopting any other currency, requirements that would end inflation

2. Strengthening the Tenth Amendment; acknowledging the sovereignty of the States

3. Implementing term limits and ending special privileges for members of the United States Congress

4. Limiting the amount of taxes government can collect, based on a percentage of national income

5. Limiting income taxation, repealing a progressive system, and requiring all citizens to pay taxes

6. Limiting the amount of money, as a percentage of national income, that government can spend each year, prohibiting Cap & Trade

7. Freedom to work, buy goods and services, and preventing Real ID implementation

8. Limiting the power of Congress to restrict and tax trade

9. Establishing a system for removal of judges, preventing citation of foreign laws, public opinion in decisions, implementing Constitutional requirement

10. Acknowledging parental rights, prohibiting the implementation of any infringing treaty

Recognizing this is a very bold concept, it is also important to note that it will not be possible to undertake such an endeavor in the present environment. I address the problems existent presently in the “movement” in a separate post. You can read the summary version here, or the full text version here.